Adopting an andragogical perspectives in fact implies placing the learner at the centre of the process – a processing which involves structural changes in the way instructors and teachers understand their own practice and role. This involves starting the process of teaching and learning from the contexts, experiences and needs of the learners. The decision of what to teach, which is usually the teacher’s/instructor’s alone, now becomes a shared responsibility (Fornaciari and Dean, 2013), and the same applies to goals and methods. Within the context of an andragogical approach, both the planning and implementation of the learning process are the result of cooperation between learners and instructors. The teacher thus becomes a facilitator rather than a prescriber.
An andragogical approach to teaching and learning can have far-reaching implications. Let’s consider some of them:
The result of this shift in perspective is more involvement and gratification for learners, better performance, all of which will result in higher levels of satisfaction and motivation.
For the teacher/instructor, however, this can be a daunting process. For one, it implies giving up power and control, a new situation for them that may create insecurity and self-doubt (Fornaciari and Dean, 2013). Secondly, this perspective also requires high level of flexibility as well as the ability to combine diverse demands (stemming from different learning needs, styles and goals) into a coherent whole, regarding lesson plans, materials to be used, assessment to be implemented.
Still, we live in a knowledge-based society. Within the framework of lifelong learning, due to the ever-present need to keep up with new advances in technology, skills and information, adult learning has become a pillar of development and a requirement for everyone. We believe adopting an andragogical approach will have a very positive impact on the relevance, accessibility and outcomes of the learning process. It involves rethinking syllabus, contents, materials and methods. Finally, it should also include an element of vision: going from merely what learners need to know to a consideration of where they aspire to be in the future as a result of the learning process (Dean and Fornaciari, 2014).
References
Dean, K.L. & Fornaciari, C.J. (2014). The 21st-Century Syllabus: Tips for Putting Andragogy into Practice. Journal of Management Education, 38(5), pp.724-732.
Fornaciari, C.J. & Dean, K.L. (2013). The 21st-Century Syllabus: From Pedagogy to Andragogy. Journal of Management Education, XX(X), pp. 1-23.
Zmeyov, S.I. (1998). Andragogy: origins, developments and trends. International Review of Education, 44(1), pp. 103-108.
This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This publication reflects the views only of the author, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. Grant Agreement number: 2018-1-PL01-KA204-050784